| art form | performance | non-performance |
|---|---|---|
| literature | poetry reading, theatre | fiction, poetry, drama |
| music | classical, pop, folk | - |
| dance | ballet, modern/contemporary, traditional | - |
| visual | - | painting/drawing, sculpture, fashion design |
| cinema | - | entertainment, art house, documentary |
| architecture | - | modern, traditional, everyday |
in language, we can distinguish between the content of a sentence and its form – e.g.
this distinction can also be applied in the case of works of art, although it may not always be obvious what the content or the form are.
art that has a clear content is called representational, other art, which appears not to be about anything, is called abstract.
| art form | content | form |
|---|---|---|
| literature | story, plot, setting | division into acts or chapters, rhyme and metre, vocabulary |
| music | lyrics, but also (the form of) emotions (Susanne K. Langer) | structure, e.g. verses, instrumentation, dynamics and speed |
| dance | ||
| visual | ||
| cinema | ||
| architecture |
it may help to think of art as a form of communication that we can compare with language:
sound, text
language: speaker/writer =======================> listener/reader
language
object, event (= it)
art: artist (= he/she) =======================> audience, spectators, ... (= me)
genre, style + critics (= they)
note: a critic is a specialist who helps us understand a (purported) work of art better, and thereby enables us to evaluate it – so I read critics even after I have attended a concert or finished a novel;
a good piece of criticism, including a good literature lesson in school, should enable me to understand, appreciate and hopefully enjoy a work more.
so when judging a (purported) work of art we can use
for each of these ways, there have been people arguing that it is the only correct one, but in practice we use all of these.